Mind Opener

I cannot write this for anything or anyone outside my experience. So I write this for me, and for the people as I see them. In my eyes everyone has a consciousness and different desires and the capability to shape their world the way they want to. I only know you the way I see you, and that is the only you that I have to deal with.
I consider you an equal, in an equal situation. Therefor I thought this information could be relevant to you, and that there could be a cooperative effort in making it work as efficiently as possible.
If there is an actual you outside of the you that I experience, then I don't know the actual you. Then I don't know what the actual you looks like, I don't know whether you can read this website or what you find on it. There is no point in attempting to talk about that.

'I' can't and don't. Not as the person that you know of. But I do believe the mind is capable of such things.
There is nothing we know that the mind can be compared with. You can't say that it is unlikely or impossible for the mind to think of everything, if it is the only thing actually thinking.

I believe this is the Buddhist point of view: that the entire world is thought for us, not by us. I propose that the world is (equal to) what you think it is. If you do not have influence on the way the world is thought, then you don't have influence on what occurs. If you are thought up (by an entity) then all your possible actions are as well. Either you do think of the world, or it doesn't matter.

The thought of being capable of changing the world consciously in a new way, does not promote arrogance or selfishness. If you would believe that the world is as you think it, it makes you as much responsible for all the good as all the bad in this world. This world is ok, but far from perfect. I wouldn't exactly be proud of it.
This world shows how little i understand of it. This is not something to be arrogant about, but something that needs some work.
And the mind isn't the person living on Earth. Realizing that everything is thought, also implies that this entire world is like a mirror of the self. I am as much a part of my self as any other person.
(Take into account the creation of the normal. If I am consistently selfish or arrogant chances are that the people around me will be the same.)

Yes those things happen and we should find out.
My idea was that the less assumptions I use, and the less objects I use, and the less relationships per object in the firmament of a theory, the more probable the theory becomes. As it is easier to be wrong than right.
You could argue that science may not have the strongest of firmaments, but its results are proven through experience to be correct in every day situations. The scientific method shows results, it works to a certain degree. Science doesn't just make sense; through science we have gained insight in this world that is of use. And ways of thinking that go against the principles of science have a hard time doing this.
However, this alone doesn't tell us to what degree the scientific method works compared to something else. If we use a new idea it might work a hundred times better or worse. The scale or usefulness of the results does not answer the question to what extend the theory is true, unless you have explored the other possibilities. That's how science works. We try a lot, and the things that work best are used, the things that don't work become interesting.
There is a very important step between theory and practice which is method. Our first attempts at flying weren't very successful either. And the very sad truth is, that while the idea on this website looks to have potential and to be somewhat probable, it is completely ignored and remains unexplored territory.
My way of thinking does not dispute the scientific results and it is their firmaments, not their results, that should determine their probability and with it our investment in exploring their effectiveness.